HBO Won't Shut Up and Take My Money
Netflix CEO says their "goal is to become HBO faster than HBO can become us." Well,
personally, I'm hoping they succeed... especially in the realm of original
series. Mostly because I want to see HBO lose. I want to see them wither and
crumble.
HBO has always had phenomenal original series because
they can take risks and make shows that will captivate, entertain, and push the
limits with worrying about ratings and sponsors and viewer demographics and
selling ad-time... which are huge factors that network shows have to constantly
consider.
But HBO has failed to adapt to the evolving and rapidly
growing digital world. No, worse than that: they have straight out *refused* to
adapt. Want to watch one of their series? Get an HBO cable subscription. Or
wait until it's out on DVD/Bluray and buy it. HBO series' aren't even available
for purchase on iTunes. HBO's series aren't even available for purchase on
iTunes.
Now, while they DO have a "streaming" service,
HBO Go, it is a joke. Because not only must you already have a standard HBO
cable subscription but it costs an addition $10/month! But the CEO of HBO was
asked when, given the growing trend of people "cable-cutting"
(ditching cable subscriptions and relying on services like Netflix, Hulu, and
Amazon Prime Instant Video services), if/when HBO Go will be made to non-cable
subscribers, he replied that cable-cutting isn't a "real thing," and
that the number of people ditching cable in favor of streaming isn't
significant and it won't catch on.
Yet, year after year, the most pirated and torrented
shows are HBO series. HBO shows are some of the most-watched shows in the world...
but the majority of those viewers pirated it to watch it. Why? Largely because HBO cable subscriptions
aren't even available in a lot of countries, but the people in those countries
still know good television when they see it. With literally no legal means to
watch it, the only option remaining is to pirate it. But in the US? It's because
HBO won't provide convenient and legitimate methods of distribution. It's the
same phenomenon that the music industry went through: people wanted digital
music, they wanted single tracks, they wanted it quickly and simply. No
legitimate method existed, so they pirated. Fast forward to iTune, Spotify,
Last.fm, etc., and music piracy is way way way down. Why? Because now it's
easier for people to get their music legitimately than it is to go through the
hassle of pirating it.
The only possible reason that I can conceive of for HBO
refusing to embrace digital distribution is that they believe doing so would
lead to a loss of their cable subscriptions. They must believe if people could
purchase the shows on iTunes or use HBO Go without a subscription, people will
have no reason to keep their cable subscription so they'll cancel it and their
revenue will drop. That must be the
reasoning they are using in order to justify it, because there is no other explanation
why they should not. If they didn't believe this was true, then what
disadvantage would they have from selling their shows on iTunes or allowing
non-HBO-subscribing people from subscribing to HBO Go at a higher price than
HBO-subscribers? HBO Go is proof that they clearly already have the means and
capability to provide streaming content on a plethora of devices and platforms.
Just like the music industry, HBO is afraid. They are
afraid to break their current distribution model. This is the model they know
and have always known, and it is scary--as a company and especially as a CEO--to
decide to break that format and venture into new waters. So, instead, HBO will play
it the way they see "safe" and do nothing. Eventually this will catch up with them, though... especially
if Netflix becomes a formidable rival when it comes to original series. They
will find themselves with slowing growth and slowing profits and that will turn
into falling growth and falling profits. At this point, they may decide to go the RIAA route and start
suing people that are pirating their shows... and, just like the RIAA
discovered, this will do more harm than good. It will be negative publicity and
harm their corporate image, especially once 80 year grandmothers that don't
even own a computer inevitably get slapped with lawsuits... just like what
happened with the RIAA. They will discover that you can't intimidate consumers
into buying (or in this case, subscribing) your product instead of pirating it
because they would rather just not have it at all. Most people who pirate don't
do it because they don't want to pay for it, they do it because it is easier.
So
once lawsuits and intimidation fails to revive their bottom line, they will
either be forced to adapt in order to survive, just as the music industry was
forced to do, or they'll be stubborn, keep the current business model but think
they can revive their numbers with some new shows or lower subscription costs
or some other crap that may appear to work in the short-term but ultimately
fail, fail, fail. The creative talent that HBO once housed for their original
series will see brighter futures, welcoming arms, and a younger, more modern,
and wider audience at places like Netflix... a company that helped to shape the
way people can consume media and entertainment instead of dismiss it and shun
it.
Screw you, HBO, because you won't shut up and take my
money.
Comments
Post a Comment